"The issue as to whether a Judge sitting singly can pass an order granting decree of divorce to the parties on the basis of the Settlement Agreement in exercise of powers conferred under Article 142 of the Constitution of India has been referred for adjudication by a larger Bench" The single-judge bench of Justice Krishna Murari has transferred the above question to a larger bench for consideration while noting: Whether a single-judge Supreme Court can exercise powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to pass a decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent? Justice Aniruddha Bose in his ruling last year has also observed it single bench of Supreme Court cannot invoke power under Article 142 of the Constitution to pass a decree for dissolving a marriage by mutual consent. In this case, the parties to a transfer petition before the Supreme Court filed a joint application for divorce by mutual consent. Justice Bose in his judgement observed that annulment of marriage will not come under any of the four categories of the cases which can be handled by a single bench as per Order VI Rule (1) of Supreme Court Rules 2013. "I am of the view that while sitting singly this Court does not have the jurisdiction to take a decision on that plea made in the joint application. One of the preconditions for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India in passing order or decree for doing complete justice is that the cause or the matter in which the Court intends to invoke the provisions thereof must be pending before it. Annulment of marriage cannot be linked to any cause or matter pending before this Court in the facts of the given case. The transfer petition arose out of matrimonial dispute between the parties, but the expression 'cause or matter pending before it' cannot be stretched to cover all disputes originating from such matrimonial problem that can be resolved by this Court, sitting singly, while hearing a transfer petition.
International Registration of Industrial Designs.The process of registration and obtaining the right.Internet Information recourses in the field of IP.
The Law of the Republic of Armenia on Copyright and Related Rigntsġ5 June 2006 Chapter 1: General ProvisionsĪrticle 1. The Subject of Regulation of the LawĪ) the relations connected with the rights of authors with respect to their works in the domains of science, literature, art (copyright) ī) the rights of performers to their performances, the rights of producers of phonograms in respect to their phonograms, the rights of film producers in respect to their fixed films, the rights of broadcasting organizations to their programs, the rights of publishers to the typographical arrangements of their editions, the rights of makers of database to the database made by them (related rights) Ĭ) collective administration of economic rights.Īrticle 2.
(1) The copyright and related rights legislation consists of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, the Civil Code of the Republic of Armenia, this Law, other laws and legal acts, the international agreements of the Republic of Armenia.
(2) If the ratified international agreements of the Republic of Armenia state norms other than those stated by this Law the norms of international agreements shall apply. (1) Subject matters of copyright shall be the unique outcome of a creative activity in the domain of science, literature and art (hereinafter referred to as “works”) created individually or jointly, which are expressed in spoken, written or any other objectively perceivable manner, including permanently or temporarily storage in electronic form, regardless of the scope, significance, merits and purpose of creation. (3) Copyright covers works both made public and not made public.Ī) literary, scientific works, as well as computer programs ī) works of painting, sculpture, graphics, design and other works of fine arts Ĭ) dramatic and dramatico-musical works, scenarios, scenario sketches, librettos, and other works created for staging į) audiovisual works ( cinematographic, television films, animation films and cartoon films, musical clips, advertisement, documentary and fact-documentary, and other films ) (2) A spoken work not expressed in a tangible form is considered objectively perceivable if it is made available to the public by public recitation, public performance or in other mode.